There are even traditions of touching the feet of teachers as a sign of respect. Moreover, there is a saying in Gujarati "સોટી વાગે ચમચમ, વિદ્યા આવે ધમધમ," which translates to "the more the teacher beats the students, the more knowledge the students gain." This indicates that, in Indian tradition, teachers are even given the right to discipline students physically.

There's even a well-known shloka in Sanskrit that equates the Guru with the three main deities of Hinduism—Brahma, Vishnu, and Mahesh (Shiva):

गुरुर्ब्रह्मा गुरुर्विष्णुः गुरुर्देवो महेश्वरः ।
गुरुः साक्षात् परब्रह्म तस्मै श्री गुरवे नमः ॥
gururbrahmā gururviṣṇuḥ gururdevo maheśvaraḥ .
guruḥ sākṣāt parabrahma tasmai śrī gurave namaḥ ..

The translation goes:
"The guru is Brahmā, the guru is Vişņu, the guru is Maheśvara (Śiva), the guru is the self-revealing limitless Brahman. Salutations to that revered guru."

But the question we must ask ourselves today is: Are modern teachers still equivalent to gods? Let’s break this down into three key points:

1. Teachers Are Professionals, Not Gods

Unlike in ancient times, today’s teachers aren’t teaching because they’re god-like figures or have a divine duty to uplift the earth. Instead, they are teaching because it's their profession, and they are paid to do so. Even in ancient times, teachers weren’t always noble. Take Dronacharya, for instance—he denied education to Eklavya due to his caste and even demanded that Eklavya cut off his thumb as "Guru Dakshina." This act of caste discrimination makes it clear that teachers were never truly "gods," not in the past and certainly not today.

A modern example can be seen in instances where students are denied access to quality education simply because they can't afford it. This is particularly prevalent in rural India, where teachers often neglect government schools to focus on lucrative private tuitions.

2. Teachers Have Become Greedy

The profession of teaching has, unfortunately, evolved into an "education mafia." Many teachers deliberately refrain from teaching effectively in schools so they can funnel students into their private coaching or tuition classes. If they provided quality education in schools, who would pay for their private lessons? Moreover, private schools have become prohibitively expensive, making quality education accessible only to the wealthy.

According to a report, the private coaching industry in India is worth over $45 billion, and it’s growing rapidly. This means that education, which should be a noble cause, has become a thriving business, catering primarily to those who can afford it. This commercial approach, despite being illegal in many cases, continues to exploit students and parents who feel they have no other choice.

3. Many Teachers Are Duffers

For many, teaching is a career choice made out of desperation, not passion. They didn’t aspire to become teachers when they chose Science or Commerce. Who dreams of becoming a teacher instead of pursuing fields like Engineering, Medicine, or Accountancy (CA/CS) when choosing Science or Commerce in 11th grade?? The sad reality is that many resort to teaching only after failing to succeed in these professional fields, which raises questions about their expertise and dedication.

This lack of passion often reflects in their teaching quality. Many teachers end up in this profession because it was their last option, not because they have a genuine interest in educating others. As a result, students suffer from substandard teaching, further undermining the concept of teachers as "gurus."

Recognizing the Exceptions

It’s important to acknowledge that not all teachers fit this mold. There are still many who are passionate, dedicated, and genuinely care about the well-being and growth of their students. They are the ones who remind us of the true essence of teaching and education, even though they are increasingly rare in today’s profit-driven system.

Conclusion

• Teachers today have largely shifted from being revered figures to sellers, and students have become their customers.
• The commercialization of education has stripped away the respect once associated with the teaching profession.

To reclaim the sanctity of education, we must move beyond this profit-driven model. Parents, students, and society must start valuing teachers who genuinely care about imparting knowledge over those who are merely in it for the money. Stricter regulations and awareness can help curb this educational greed, but the change must start with how we view and value education itself.

Who Aspires to Be a Teacher?

Let’s start with a simple question: Who truly wants to be a teacher today? Most students choose Science or Commerce streams with dreams of becoming Engineers, Doctors, Chartered Accountants (CA), or Company Secretaries (CS). Teaching is rarely the first career choice for these students.

Who Ends Up Teaching in Colleges?

So, who ends up in the classrooms of Engineering, Medical, Pharmacy, Dental, MBA, or Commerce colleges? In many cases, it's those who initially pursued these streams but couldn’t make it as successful professionals. Whether it’s due to lower exam scores, lack of opportunity, or other factors, these individuals often land in teaching as a last-resort career option.

Why Teachers May Not Be the Best Guides

This leaves students in a challenging position. Teachers who haven’t succeeded in their intended careers may struggle to offer relevant guidance in rapidly evolving industries. While they might cover the academic basics, their advice often falls short of what students need to thrive in today’s competitive job market. Instead of relying solely on these teachers, students should seek advice from professionals who have excelled in their fields and can offer real-world insights.

A Note on Arts Teachers

To be fair, not all teachers fit this mold. Those who choose Arts or other fields often pursue teaching as a deliberate career choice, bringing passion and expertise to the classroom. For them, becoming an educator can be a rewarding path, and their teaching might align more closely with their strengths.

What Can Students Do?

So, how can students navigate this gap? Here are some steps to take:

• Seek mentorship from industry professionals who are currently working in the field you aspire to enter.
• Attend workshops and seminars that offer practical, real-world knowledge beyond what’s taught in the classroom.
• Focus on internships or practical experiences that allow you to apply your learning in a professional setting.

Conclusion

In today’s fast-paced world, it’s vital to recognize the limitations of traditional education. While teachers play a foundational role, the true path to success lies in supplementing that knowledge with guidance from those who have succeeded professionally. Take charge of your career by seeking mentorship, gaining hands-on experience, and staying focused on your goals beyond the classroom.

1. It Reflects Poor Preparation

Asking a recruiter what questions will be asked in the interview suggests that you haven’t done enough research on your own. In today’s world, there are countless resources available—such as job descriptions, company websites, and even platforms like Glassdoor—that offer insights into common interview questions for specific roles. Relying on the recruiter to hand over the questions can make you appear unprepared and less self-sufficient. Instead, take the initiative to study the role, research the company, and understand the skills and competencies likely to be tested.

2. It Signals Lack of Flexibility

Interviews are designed to evaluate how well you can think on your feet. By asking for the questions in advance, you may come across as someone who is uncomfortable with ambiguity or who struggles to handle unexpected situations. Employers want candidates who can adapt, stay calm under pressure, and tackle new challenges confidently. Requesting the questions beforehand can suggest you may not have the flexibility they’re looking for.

3. It Can Undermine Your Authenticity

The goal of an interview is to see how you respond naturally to questions, not how well you can memorize prepared answers. If you go into the interview knowing the exact questions, your responses may come off as rehearsed and inauthentic. Interviewers can usually tell when someone is giving a scripted answer, which may cause them to doubt whether they’re seeing the real you. Showcasing your ability to think critically and respond genuinely will leave a stronger, more positive impression.

4. It Shifts Focus from the Conversation

An interview is meant to be a two-way conversation where both parties assess if the job and the candidate are the right fit. By asking for the questions beforehand, you turn the interview into more of a quiz than a discussion. This approach can make it harder for you to engage naturally with the interviewer, limiting your ability to build rapport and connect on a deeper level. Instead of focusing solely on what questions might be asked, think about how you can have a meaningful conversation and demonstrate your interest in the company and role.

5. It Reflects a Lack of Confidence

Asking for the questions can give the impression that you lack confidence in your ability to handle the interview. Confidence is a key trait that recruiters look for because it indicates that you believe in your qualifications and can handle challenges that come your way. Rather than seeking a “cheat sheet,” focus on building your confidence through preparation, practice, and a strong understanding of your own skills and experiences.

Remember: When you question, it means you have confusion. And where there's confusion, there’s no action.

6. It Reduces Your Chances to Showcase Problem-Solving Skills

One of the key aspects employers test during interviews is how you approach problem-solving. When you don’t know the questions in advance, you’re forced to think on your feet and offer thoughtful, spontaneous responses. This is a great opportunity to show how you tackle new situations and resolve challenges—a valuable skill in any job. By asking for the questions ahead of time, you miss the chance to display your critical thinking and problem-solving abilities.

How to Prepare Instead of Asking for Interview Questions

While you shouldn’t ask recruiters what questions will be asked, there are plenty of other ways to prepare thoroughly for your interview:

• Research the role and company: Start by studying the job description closely and identifying the key skills and competencies required for the role. Research the company’s mission, culture, and industry trends. This will help you understand the broader context of the role and anticipate the types of questions that may be asked.
• Practice common interview questions: Based on your research, you can predict the kinds of questions you might encounter. For example, many interviews include questions about your experience, problem-solving abilities, teamwork, and leadership skills. Practicing responses to these questions will help you feel more confident and prepared.
• Prepare your own questions: Interviews aren’t just about answering questions—they’re also an opportunity for you to ask insightful questions about the company and the role. Come prepared with thoughtful questions that demonstrate your interest and engagement.
• Focus on your achievements: Be ready to highlight specific examples of your past work, especially those that align with the job you’re applying for. Use the STAR (Situation, Task, Action, Result) method to structure your responses and showcase your contributions.

Conclusion

Asking recruiters what questions will be asked during an interview is a mistake that can hurt your chances of making a good impression. It reflects poor preparation, a lack of flexibility, and a lack of confidence—all qualities that employers value in potential hires. Instead of trying to anticipate every question, focus on researching the role, practicing common interview scenarios, and preparing your own thoughtful questions. By doing so, you’ll walk into the interview confident, well-prepared, and ready to handle whatever comes your way naturally and authentically.

1. An Overflow of Unskilled Candidates

One of the most significant challenges HRs face is sorting through an overwhelming number of unqualified candidates. Out of 100 applications, only 1 or 2 might truly be a good fit for the job. This time-consuming task can be incredibly frustrating and makes the recruitment process far more tedious than it should be.

2. No-Shows and Technical Issues During Interviews

Online interviews come with their own set of challenges. Often, candidates schedule interviews and fail to show up, or they join late with poor internet connections, malfunctioning webcams, or audio problems. Some arrive unprepared, which further erodes trust and creates an unprofessional impression. These consistent problems wear down HRs and contribute to their frustration.

3. Irrelevant and Strange Questions

Many candidates ask unrelated or unusual questions during the hiring process. They inquire about other vacancies before even being considered for the one they applied to, or they focus too much on questions about company policies or interview content instead of showing interest in the role itself. Some even ask about consequences for being late to the interview. These interactions waste time and add to HR's stress.

4. Message Bombardment

HR professionals are often inundated with messages from candidates, ranging from follow-ups to excessive queries. This barrage of messages disrupts their workflow and makes it difficult to focus on their primary responsibilities. For HRs handling numerous applicants, this constant communication can be overwhelming.

5. Excessive Follow-ups on Interview Results

Candidates frequently bombard HRs with excessive follow-ups about interview outcomes. While it’s natural to want to know where you stand, too many follow-ups can slow the process and put unnecessary pressure on the HR team. This adds an additional layer of stress to an already demanding job.

6. Unrealistic Expectations from Candidates

Another source of frustration is when candidates, especially freshers, have unrealistic expectations. Some demand accommodations, meals, daily commute expenses, or even flights if they are relocating from another city. While perks are part of the job for experienced professionals, these requests from fresh graduates can come across as presumptuous, especially when they haven’t yet proved their value to the company.

7. Candidates Not Joining After Being Selected

One of the most disheartening situations HRs face is when candidates decline the offer after being selected. Whether it’s due to another job offer or personal reasons, this reinforces trust issues for HRs. The time and resources spent on the selection process feel wasted, and it delays finding the right candidate for the role.

How Candidates Can Make HR's Job Easier

Given the challenges HR professionals face, candidates can take several steps to make the hiring process smoother and reduce frustration:

• Be prepared for interviews: Ensure your internet, webcam, and microphone work properly before an interview. Show up on time and with proper preparation.
• Only apply if you're qualified: Read the job description carefully and only apply if you meet the qualifications. This will save time for both you and the HR team.
• Ask relevant questions: Avoid inquiring about other vacancies or irrelevant topics during the interview process. Focus on the position you're applying for.
• Limit follow-ups: While it's fine to follow up once or twice after an interview, avoid excessive messaging. Respect the HR's time and process.
• Manage your expectations: Be realistic about what the company can offer, especially if you’re a fresher. Requesting extra perks before proving your worth can backfire.
• Commit to your decision: If you’re serious about joining, honor your commitment after being selected. This builds trust and shows professionalism.

Conclusion

HR professionals aren't inherently rude or frustrated, but the nature of their job exposes them to a variety of stressors that job seekers may not understand. From sorting through unqualified applicants to dealing with candidates who fail to honor their commitments, the challenges they face are numerous. By being more considerate and professional, candidates can not only increase their chances of getting hired but also make the hiring process more efficient and pleasant for everyone involved.

Centuries ago, humans lived in closer alignment with nature, free from the laws, rules, and systems that govern us today. In ancient times, especially in India, boys and girls married as soon as they entered their teenage years, which is arguably the most natural time to marry. Biologically, adolescence is when humans gain the ability and desire to mate and reproduce. By marrying young, people of that era synced with nature, starting families as soon as they were physically ready. Unlike today, where marriage is delayed, people then followed a path similar to other species that begin mating as soon as they reach puberty.

Professional Settlement in the Teenage Years

On the professional front, people also settled into their roles by their teenage years. Most children adopted the professions of their parents, following the hereditary traditions they had observed growing up. For example, a carpenter’s child would start learning the craft early, becoming proficient by adolescence. Similarly, the children of kings were trained in warfare and politics, while Brahmin children learned religious texts and rituals. I’m not advocating the caste or varna system here—quite the opposite, I stand against it—but the reality is that this was the norm for professional settlement in those times. By their teenage years, people had acquired the skills necessary to pursue a livelihood, meaning they were both professionally and personally settled at a young age.

How Modern Systems Delay Life's Milestones

Today, however, the systems we live under have drastically altered this natural rhythm. Laws now impose a legal age for marriage, typically between 18 and 21. The education system further delays this process—students often don’t finish their studies until the age of 22 or 23, and it takes another 4-5 years to secure professional stability. As a result, even those who might want to marry early find themselves unable to do so before their mid-to-late twenties. Financial and professional stability are often seen as prerequisites for marriage, and this shift in priorities has pushed marriage further into adulthood.

The Consequences of Breaking Nature’s Sync

This delay disrupts the natural sync between our biological clocks and modern societal expectations. By the time people marry today, they are often years removed from the age when their natural reproductive urges first arose. Teenagers experience a biological drive to mate as soon as they enter puberty, but legal and social barriers prevent them from marrying and starting families. Similarly, professional dependency on parents extends into their twenties, further delaying the transition to independence. Centuries ago, by the age of 30, one could have grandchildren—having married around 13 or 14, had their first child at 14 or 15, and seen their children marry and start families by their late twenties. In stark contrast, today, many people are just getting married at 30.

The Modern Challenge: Laws and Social Norms

The consequences of this delay are far-reaching. Many young people engage in premarital affairs, driven by natural desires that emerge in their teenage years but are left unmet by the constraints of modern laws and systems. The long gap between nature’s timeline and societal expectations can create emotional and psychological stress, as people feel out of sync with their biological drives.

Additionally, in the past, marrying early meant that individuals typically formed strong, lifelong bonds with a single partner. Today, the delayed timeline for marriage and professional settlement has transformed the nature of relationships. While modern laws were created to protect young people and ensure maturity before marriage, the unintended consequence is that half of one’s life is spent dependent on parents or struggling to establish a career before forming a family.

Seeking Balance

While we cannot—and should not—return to the practices of the past, it’s worth considering how we can better align our lives with our natural instincts. Perhaps creating more flexible systems that recognize the diversity of personal and professional growth would help us achieve a healthier balance between nature’s timing and societal expectations. Finding ways to navigate this modern disconnect could help us lead more fulfilling and balanced lives, in harmony with both our biological and social needs.

A Real-Life Example

Consider the case of Rohan, a talented software developer from Bangalore. After spending three years at an Indian service-based firm, he decided to accept an offer from a prominent US tech company. Rohan cited the desire for better salary, job security, and the opportunity to work on innovative projects as his primary motivations. His experience highlights a trend where many developers seek more rewarding career paths abroad.

1. Limited Opportunities in India

Indian IT companies are predominantly service-based, offering fewer opportunities for innovation and product development. Unlike the USA, which hosts a plethora of product-based companies, Indian firms often focus on outsourcing and IT services. This limitation stifles creativity and hinders career growth, prompting developers to seek opportunities abroad.

2. Higher Salaries in Foreign Companies

Salary differences play a crucial role in this preference. A survey revealed that software developers in the USA earn, on average, 60-80% more than their Indian counterparts. The vast salary gap makes foreign employment far more financially attractive, incentivizing Indian developers to consider international options.

3. Lack of Government Support

The Indian IT sector has not seen significant government support or incentives, making it challenging for local companies to compete with global giants. Countries like the USA offer policies and financial backing that foster innovation and growth in the IT industry, making it easier for firms to attract top talent.

4. High Taxation

Tax rates for Indian professionals can be burdensome, further reducing net income for developers working for domestic companies. For instance, income tax rates can exceed 30% for high earners, significantly impacting take-home pay. In contrast, many foreign companies offer competitive salaries that remain attractive even after accounting for taxes.

5. A Better Lifestyle

Working for a foreign company often comes with the promise of an improved lifestyle. Many foreign employers provide flexible working hours, remote work options, and a healthier work-life balance. This contrasts with the often long and demanding hours prevalent in Indian IT firms, which can lead to burnout.

6. Stronger Employment Rules Abroad

Foreign companies tend to have well-defined employment rules that ensure better job security, benefits, and workplace rights. For example, US companies often offer comprehensive health insurance and retirement benefits, which are not always guaranteed in Indian firms. This structured approach to employment is appealing to many developers.

7. The Wealthiest IT Companies Are Based in the USA

The USA is home to the world’s wealthiest IT giants – Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta. These companies dominate the global tech industry, offering developers not only better salaries but also the chance to work on cutting-edge technologies. The sheer scale and influence of these companies make them attractive employers for talent worldwide.

8. More Product-Based Companies in the USA

While India is dominated by service-based IT companies, the USA is known for its product-based firms. Companies like Google and Amazon create innovative products that shape the industry. Product-based companies often offer more challenging, innovative, and rewarding work environments, appealing to developers looking to make a significant impact in their field.

The Role of Startups

While many Indian developers lean towards foreign firms, it's important to note the rising trend of startups in India. More Indian startups are transitioning to product-oriented models, offering exciting opportunities for developers. However, the landscape is still skewed toward service-based companies, necessitating further evolution in the domestic market.

Conclusion

The preference of Indian software developers for foreign companies stems from a combination of better opportunities, higher salaries, improved lifestyles, and more structured employment rules. This trend highlights the challenges that the Indian IT sector faces in retaining its talent, emphasizing the need for systemic changes, government support, and the development of more product-based companies. By addressing these issues, Indian companies can create an environment where talented developers choose to stay and thrive within the country.

1. Extremely Cheap Labour

One of the most significant reasons foreign companies prefer Indian professionals is the cost savings. Indian freelancers typically charge between Rs. 5,000 to Rs. 10,000 ($60 to $120) for a complete package that includes design, image editing, source code writing, setup, text content writing, SEO, and speed optimization. In comparison, a similar project completed by a US agency or freelancer could cost around $5,000 (approximately Rs. 410,000). This massive price difference allows foreign companies to access high-quality services without breaking the bank.

Supporting Data: According to a recent survey by Deloitte, companies can save up to 60% on operating costs by outsourcing to India. This substantial cost advantage continues to make India the preferred destination for IT outsourcing.

2. Diversified Skill Set

Indian IT professionals are known for their versatility and wide-ranging expertise in various technologies. From web development to data science, Indian freelancers and companies are adept at using the latest tools and frameworks. This skill diversity means foreign companies can find the exact expertise they need, whether it's for building a mobile app, developing a complex website, or implementing AI-based solutions.

3. Increasing Professionalism Despite Stereotypes

While Indian professionals were once stereotyped as lacking in professionalism, globalization is steadily changing this narrative. Today, many Indian freelancers have extensive experience working with international clients, which has pushed them to adopt more professional practices. They’re increasingly aware of global standards, deadlines, and communication norms, making them more reliable partners for foreign companies.

Case in Point: A recent study by Upwork found that 80% of clients who worked with Indian freelancers rated their professionalism and communication as "very good" or "excellent," showcasing a significant shift in work ethics.

4. Quality Assurance

Despite the lower costs, the quality of work delivered by Indian IT professionals is often on par with global standards. Many Indian freelancers and companies hold certifications in specialized areas like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure, which ensures they have up-to-date knowledge and skills. Additionally, a growing number of Indian professionals have advanced degrees in computer science and engineering, contributing to their ability to deliver high-quality work consistently.

5. Cultural Adaptability and Flexibility

Indian IT professionals are known for their adaptability to different time zones, work cultures, and communication styles. They are often willing to adjust their working hours to align with the client’s schedule, making collaboration seamless. This flexibility is particularly valuable for foreign clients who need real-time updates or prefer working closely with their outsourced teams.

Conclusion

Foreign companies prefer Indian companies and freelancers for their IT needs primarily due to the cost-effectiveness, diversified skill set, growing professionalism, and adaptability of Indian professionals. As more Indian freelancers and agencies continue to upskill and adapt to global standards, this trend is likely to strengthen further. For any foreign business looking to maximize value while ensuring quality, India remains a go-to destination for IT solutions.

1. Lack of Awareness About Business Models

Indian clients often lack an understanding of how the IT industry operates. They tend to approach software development with a traditional, "desi" mindset and are less aware of modern business models. For example, a local manufacturing client may insist on outdated practices instead of leveraging technology for operational efficiency, making it challenging for IT companies to explain the intricacies of software projects.

2. Confusion Between Off-the-Shelf and Bespoke Solutions

Developing software is an expensive process. A common misconception among Indian clients is the failure to differentiate between off-the-shelf products (developed once and sold to multiple clients) and bespoke software (custom solutions tailored to specific needs). Many Indian clients expect the cost of bespoke development to be the same as an off-the-shelf product, leading to friction over pricing.

3. Low Awareness of IT's Transformative Power

Many Indian clients don't fully grasp how IT can transform their business operations. Research shows that companies that invest in technology see a significant increase in productivity and growth. However, the reluctance to invest makes it tough for IT companies to convince them of the potential long-term benefits.

4. Limited Budgets

Due to financial constraints, Indian clients often have limited budgets. This limits IT companies' ability to offer high-quality services, as they must adhere to strict budget limits. For instance, a software development project requiring extensive features may need to be scaled down significantly due to budget restrictions.

5. Hard Bargaining and Negotiations

Even when they decide to invest in IT services, Indian clients tend to engage in hard bargaining and negotiations. This creates a challenging sales environment, where companies often have to lower their prices to secure contracts, ultimately affecting their profit margins.

6. Lack of Seriousness in Inquiries

Many inquiries from Indian clients aren’t genuine; they often contact IT companies merely to inquire about prices without any real intention of purchasing. This lack of seriousness wastes time and resources for IT companies, who may invest considerable effort in preparing proposals that ultimately go nowhere.

7. Reluctance to Invest in Consultations

Indian clients frequently avoid investing in pre-project consultations to cut costs. This lack of clarity regarding project requirements leads to multiple revisions later on. They expect a fixed price for their projects without understanding that a well-defined project scope usually requires upfront investment in consultation.

8. Excessive Demands

Indian clients are often more demanding, expecting work beyond the initially agreed-upon scope without additional charges. For instance, a client might ask for additional features midway through a project, expecting them to be completed at no extra cost. This can lead to unrealistic workloads and strained relationships with IT companies.

9. Impatience for Fast, High-Quality Work

Indian clients typically expect quick results, even for complex projects. They desire top-notch quality, speedy delivery, and low costs all at once. This impatience can lead to compromises in quality, as they often fail to understand that fast and cheap work cannot always yield high quality.

10. Payment and Confirmation Issues

Indian clients often insist on making payments in multiple installments and sometimes pay less than the agreed amount. Additionally, even when they agree to pay the full amount, there is often a delay in payment, which disrupts cash flow and creates financial challenges for IT companies. Furthermore, after discussing project details over the phone, Indian clients tend to take considerable time to confirm whether they will proceed with the order. This indecisiveness leads to extended follow-ups and delays in starting the project.

11. Increased Disputes

All of the above factors collectively contribute to frequent disputes between Indian clients and IT companies. These disputes can arise from payment delays, project scope changes, or unrealistic demands, making the overall working relationship challenging.

Conclusion

• While Indian clients present unique challenges, there is a significant opportunity for improvement on both sides. By fostering a better understanding of the IT landscape, Indian clients can enhance their approach to projects, leading to smoother collaborations.
• IT companies, on their part, should invest in educating their clients about the value of technology and proper project management. Ultimately, better communication and a willingness to adapt can pave the way for more successful partnerships in the Indian IT industry.

She asked about the number of employees in the company, their gender demographics, how she would be trained if lacking knowledge in certain areas, and even requested that a different job title be mentioned on her offer letter instead of "Personal Assistant." To make matters worse, she began asking what questions I'd be asking during the interview and, once hired, what the consequences would be if she were occasionally late to work. Then, she asked the one question that completely shifted the outcome: “What is the interview process?”

I wasn’t in the mood to explain the entire process over WhatsApp, so I shared a link to this article detailing the various rounds. After going through it, she stated that she wouldn't be able to pass the Aptitude Test. Given her strong communication skills, I had planned to either make the test easier for her or skip it altogether because the role didn't require extensive aptitude skills. But since she expressed doubt about passing, I had to be honest and tell her to prepare, as I couldn’t promise to make it easy or skip it via WhatsApp.

It is not about whose mistake it was or whether I should have explained the selection process or not. It is just about the outcome of the question she asked. Her lack of confidence became clear, and she eventually withdrew her application, convinced that she wasn’t the right candidate. Had she not asked too many questions—especially about the interview process—I would have either simplified or omitted the test, and she would have had a great chance of being hired. Her incessant questioning changed the chain of events, leading to an entirely different outcome. This experience reminded me of the proverb, "Curiosity killed the cat," and how asking too many questions can sometimes lead to unintended negative consequences.

1. The Psychological Factors Behind Excessive Questioning

While it’s easy to see the negative outcomes of asking too many questions, it’s essential to understand the psychological reasons behind this behavior. Here are some key factors that contribute to excessive questioning:

1.1 Fear of the Unknown:

• Explanation: One of the most common reasons people over-question is fear—fear of uncertainty or lack of control. When we don’t have all the answers, our minds often fill in the gaps with worst-case scenarios, prompting us to seek more information to feel secure.
• Example: In the case of the young woman, her excessive questioning about the interview process may have stemmed from a fear of not knowing what to expect, which ultimately led to her doubting herself.

1.2 Perfectionism and Anxiety:

• Explanation: Perfectionists feel the need to gather every detail before making decisions. This tendency to over-analyze and over-prepare can lead to asking numerous questions to ensure they have every piece of information. However, this often results in increased anxiety and indecision.
• Example: The woman’s fear of not passing the Aptitude Test could have been rooted in her perfectionistic mindset. Her need to be fully prepared led her to over-question instead of trusting her existing skills, ultimately sabotaging her opportunity.

1.3 Lack of Confidence:

• Explanation: People who lack self-confidence often ask more questions to seek validation or reassurance. They doubt their abilities and feel the need to confirm details repeatedly, which can signal insecurity to others.
• Example: Despite her impressive resume, the woman’s repeated questions about the interview process revealed her lack of confidence, leading her to withdraw when faced with the possibility of failure.

1.4 Social Conditioning:

• Explanation: Some individuals believe that asking questions demonstrates intelligence and preparedness, but there’s a fine line. Excessive questioning can signal indecision or lack of self-assurance, which may harm one’s reputation.
• Example: The woman might have thought that asking many questions would make her appear more professional, but instead, it conveyed uncertainty and reduced her chances of being hired.

1.5 Analysis Paralysis:

• Explanation: Overthinking can lead to "analysis paralysis," where a person becomes so fixated on gathering information that they’re unable to make a decision or take action. This often results in missed opportunities or delayed progress.
• Example: In her case, analysis paralysis took over when she began doubting her ability to pass the Aptitude Test, leading her to withdraw from the opportunity altogether.

2. The Observer Effect: When Attention Magnifies Problems

In quantum physics, the Observer Effect shows that observing a particle can change its behavior. In real life, paying too much attention to an issue can do the same—turning minor concerns into major obstacles. Sometimes, it's better to let things unfold naturally, as the proverb "Let sleeping dogs lie" suggests.

• Everyday Example: Imagine being in a work meeting where someone keeps questioning every detail of a plan. What starts as a simple inquiry can quickly spiral into doubt and second-guessing, causing delays and reducing confidence in the project. Sometimes, by focusing too much on potential problems, we end up creating them.

3. Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: When Questions Become a Curse

The self-fulfilling prophecy warns us that our expectations can manifest in reality. When we repeatedly ask about potential pitfalls or failures, we might unintentionally bring them to life. This aligns with the saying, "Be careful what you wish for—you just might get it."

• Real-Life Example Recap: The young woman mentioned earlier doubted her ability to pass the Aptitude Test before even trying. Her repeated questioning about the interview process led to her self-doubt and eventual withdrawal from the opportunity, despite her high chances of being hired. Her excessive curiosity caused her to lose an opportunity that was almost within her grasp.

4. Synchronicity: When Questions Invite Unwanted Consequences

Synchronicity suggests that asking questions can align us with unexpected opportunities—but not all of them are positive. Sometimes, our inquiries lead us down paths we’d rather avoid, attracting situations or people that complicate our lives. As another saying goes, "If you seek trouble, you'll find it."

• Example: A person obsessed with finding out if they’re being taken advantage of might start seeing deception everywhere. They might become paranoid, driving away friends or colleagues who feel mistrusted. In this way, the act of asking too many questions doesn’t reveal hidden truths but rather creates them.

5. The Impact of Curiosity in Different Aspects of Life

In Professional Settings:
Asking too many questions during a job interview or team meeting can come across as indecisive or unprepared. Instead of showcasing curiosity, it can signal a lack of confidence or an inability to commit to decisions. This can damage your reputation and hinder career advancement, as seen in the example shared above.

In Relationships:
Constantly probing your partner about their feelings, intentions, or actions can strain the relationship. What might start as genuine curiosity can quickly turn into an interrogation, fostering insecurity and pushing the other person away. Sometimes, "ignorance is bliss," and it’s better not to dig too deep.

In Personal Development:
While introspection is crucial for growth, there’s a fine line between self-awareness and self-doubt. Asking yourself too many questions about your worth, abilities, or future can lead to anxiety and paralysis, preventing you from taking action or moving forward.

6. Practical Tips for Balancing Curiosity with Caution

• Choose Your Questions Wisely: Not every question needs to be asked. Focus on inquiries that genuinely contribute to understanding or problem-solving, rather than those driven by fear or doubt.
• Recognize When to Stop: Pay attention to the impact your questions have on yourself and others. If you notice that they’re leading to confusion, frustration, or negativity, it might be time to step back. Remember, "Don't go looking for trouble."
• Trust the Process: Often, things unfold best without endless questioning. Learning to trust yourself, others, and the journey can be more valuable than seeking constant answers.

Conclusion: When Curiosity Crosses the Line

While asking questions can be a powerful tool for growth, insight, and connection, there’s a tipping point where curiosity becomes counterproductive. The act of inquiry can amplify problems, create unnecessary stress, and even drive away opportunities or relationships. As demonstrated by the example above, sometimes asking too many questions can change the outcome for the worse.

The next time you feel the urge to ask one more question, pause and ask yourself: Is it truly necessary, or are you just feeding your doubts? After all, as the saying goes, "Curiosity killed the cat." Sometimes, knowing when to hold back can be just as important as knowing when to inquire. Many things might happen differently because you asked about them—but not all of those outcomes will be in your favor.

By understanding the potential downsides of excessive questioning, we can learn to strike a balance between curiosity and caution, ensuring that our inquiries lead us toward positive, rather than negative, outcomes.

Key Takeaways:

• Asking too many questions can magnify problems and create unnecessary obstacles.
• Excessive curiosity can lead to self-doubt, missed opportunities, and unintended consequences.
• Choose your questions wisely, know when to stop, and learn to trust the process.

Understanding the Stakeholders

In reality, education has become a business where each stakeholder plays a specific role. Let’s explore these roles in the educational ecosystem.

1. Universities/Boards: The Planners

Universities and boards design the curriculum and decide what students will learn. They create educational standards, often without considering the needs of the job market. This disconnect results in a curriculum that fails to prepare students for real-world challenges, leading to a significant gap between education and employability.

2. Colleges/Schools: The Greedy Profiteers

Colleges and schools, which should serve as educational hubs, often function more like profit-driven businesses. They charge exorbitant fees while providing substandard facilities and underqualified teachers. Many are run by politicians or linked to political parties, allowing them to bypass regulations and engage in corrupt practices. Their focus is on maximizing profits rather than delivering quality education, treating students and parents as mere sources of income. A well-known case is the Vyapam scam in Madhya Pradesh, where influential politicians and businessmen manipulated entrance exams for professional courses, jeopardizing the careers of countless students.

3. Teachers: The Disinterested Executors

Teachers are crucial in implementing the educational plans. However, many enter the profession due to a lack of other opportunities. Often unskilled and underpaid, they lack the motivation to inspire students. This results in a disengaged workforce that struggles to provide effective education, further diminishing the quality of learning and contributing to the overall inefficiency of the system. Instances of teachers focusing more on private tuition than classroom teaching reflect the deteriorating commitment to student development.

4. Students: The Disillusioned Beneficiaries

Students, the primary beneficiaries of the system, often find themselves caught in a cycle of disappointment. The education they receive rarely aligns with industry demands or their personal aspirations. This disconnect leaves them feeling unprepared and anxious about their future, contributing to widespread frustration and discontent among young learners. For example, a 2019 survey revealed that 48% of Indian graduates felt unprepared for their jobs, highlighting the mismatch between education and employment.

5. Parents: The Powerless Payers

Parents make significant financial sacrifices to provide education for their children but have little influence over what or how their children are taught. Despite their investments, they are left watching helplessly as their children navigate an education system that does not guarantee success. Their role is limited to paying the bills, with no control over the quality or relevance of the education provided. The case of exorbitant fees charged by private schools in metropolitan cities is a stark reminder of how parents are exploited in the name of education.

6. Industry: The Demanding Employers

The industry, which relies on the education system to produce skilled graduates, often finds itself disappointed. The curriculum set by educational institutions rarely meets the skills required in the job market. This results in a workforce that is underprepared for employment, forcing companies to invest in additional training to bridge the gap between education and job readiness. Many industries, such as IT and manufacturing, have reported spending substantial resources on retraining fresh graduates.

The Problems

1. Out-of-Touch Planning

Universities and boards decide what will be taught without understanding market needs. Their disconnected approach forces teachers, students, and parents to follow an outdated curriculum that doesn’t prepare students for the future. This lack of alignment leads to graduates who are ill-equipped for professional demands.

2. Profit-Driven Colleges and Schools

Colleges and schools prioritize profit over education. They charge high fees while cutting costs on essential services like faculty salaries and infrastructure. Their political ties allow them to exploit loopholes and continue malpractices with impunity. As a result, students receive a poor education, and parents are left to bear the financial burden without seeing meaningful returns.

3. Unmotivated and Unskilled Teachers

Many teachers lack the passion or skills to educate effectively. They enter the profession as a last resort, and their lack of commitment and training diminishes the quality of education. This impacts students directly, as they receive inadequate guidance and support, further contributing to their disillusionment and disengagement.

4. Disengaged and Anxious Students

Students are aware that their education doesn’t meet industry standards. This awareness, coupled with high expectations and pressure, often leads to anxiety and stress. The lack of a clear path from education to employment leaves many students feeling lost and unprepared for the future.

5. Helpless and Frustrated Parents

Parents, despite paying high fees, have no say in their children’s education. They are forced to accept whatever the schools and colleges provide, with no control over the quality or relevance of the curriculum. Their financial investment often feels wasted when their children fail to secure good jobs or career opportunities.

6. Mismatched Industry Demands

The industry requires graduates with specific skills that the current education system doesn’t provide. Companies struggle to find qualified candidates, and graduates face challenges in securing jobs that match their education. This mismatch results in a lack of suitable talent in the job market, creating a frustrating situation for both employers and job seekers.

The Outcome

The consequences of this flawed system are predictable and disheartening:

• Colleges and schools continue to profit without providing quality education.
• Teachers remain underpaid and demotivated, with little impact on students’ learning.
• Parents lose money and see little return on their investment.
• Students suffer from inadequate preparation and uncertain futures.
• Universities and boards operate disconnected from real-world needs.
• The industry struggles to find qualified talent but manages to adapt through additional training and development.

Conclusion

The Indian education system, as it stands, is a flawed business model that values profit over purpose. The stakeholders need to realign their goals to ensure that students receive an education that equips them for the future. Only then can we hope to create a system that benefits everyone involved. Without a collective effort to address these systemic issues, the cycle of disappointment and inefficiency will continue, leaving millions of young minds unfulfilled and underprepared.

Let's start with two questions you could ask a child:

1. How can I pick a jar placed at a high spot?
2. What is the use of a ladder?

Which question do you think is more challenging?

The first question prompts the child to think creatively and come up with a tool that can solve the problem. The second question, on the other hand, asks the child to identify problems that a given tool (a ladder) can solve. Real-life scenarios are more like the first question. In reality, you don’t have to think about all the potential uses of the tools you already have. Instead, you need to discover or create tools that solve the problems you encounter.

Similarly, during interviews, I design questions that require candidates to think of a feature of a language or technology that addresses a specific issue, rather than just asking them about the predefined uses of a feature.

A Better Approach to Technical Interviews

When I interview candidates for Frontend Developer or Website Designer positions, I avoid straightforward questions like:

• “What does the <input type='file' /> element do in HTML?”
• “What does the caret-color property do in CSS?”

These questions test theoretical knowledge but don’t provide insight into whether the candidate can apply these features in real-world scenarios. In reality, candidates won’t be explaining these properties to clients. Instead, they will be asked to implement specific features, like a file upload control or changing the cursor color in a text box.

The <input type='file' /> tag, for example, is used to create a file upload button, allowing users to select files from their device. The caret-color property controls the color of the blinking cursor inside a text box. If the developer has practical experience with these features, they will be able to implement them effectively.

Real-World Interview Questions

Instead of asking candidates what these features do, I pose questions like:

• “How would you implement a file upload feature and ensure the uploaded file is of a specific type, such as a PDF?”
• “How can you change the cursor color in a text box?”

These types of questions assess whether the candidate has a deep understanding and practical experience with these technologies. They can only answer accurately if they’ve worked hands-on with these features and have a solid grasp of the concepts.

For instance, I once interviewed a candidate who could recite definitions of CSS properties but struggled to implement a responsive design. This showed that while theoretical knowledge is important, practical application is what truly matters. On another occasion, a candidate with less theoretical knowledge excelled in solving a complex layout problem because they had hands-on experience with flexbox and grid systems in CSS.

Key Takeaways

1. For Technical Interviewers: To better evaluate a candidate's proficiency, ask questions that focus on achieving a specific outcome rather than just identifying a feature's purpose. For example, while interviewing for VB.NET positions, instead of asking, “What is the use of the MustInherit keyword?”, ask, “How do I ensure a class is compulsorily inherited?” This approach will reveal whether the candidate has practical experience with the MustInherit keyword or not.
2. For Candidates: Learn programming languages and technologies by doing practical projects rather than just reading theories from books or tutorials. Real-world experience is crucial for developing a comprehensive understanding of different features and their applications. Build projects from scratch to encounter and solve real-world problems, and ensure you’re well-prepared for any scenario you might face in an interview.

By focusing on practical problem-solving and real-world application, both interviewers and candidates can ensure that the interview process is not just challenging but also meaningful. This approach helps in identifying truly skilled professionals who are capable of tackling the complex challenges they will face in their careers.

[1] What is the difference between an Array and a Set in JavaScript?
Answer: An Array allows duplicate values, while a Set only stores unique values. Arrays maintain insertion order and use numeric indices, while Sets do not allow duplicate elements and do not provide direct indexing.

[2] Using which for loop can I iterate through all properties of an array and using which for loop can I iterate through all elements of an array?
Answer:

• To iterate through all properties of an array (including non-index properties), use a for...in loop.
• To iterate through all elements of an array, use a for...of loop or a traditional for loop.

[3] Name any 5 array functions in JavaScript.
Answer: Some common array functions are:

1. push()
2. pop()
3. slice()
4. map()
5. filter()

[4] How to check if an input element contains valid data using JavaScript?
Answer: Use the checkValidity() method of the input element to check if the input value is valid based on HTML5 validation rules.

[5] How to parse a string to a number in JavaScript?
Answer: You can use parseInt(), parseFloat(), or the unary + operator to parse a string into a number.

[6] Is there any difference between adding JavaScript before closing </head> and before closing </body> tag?
Answer: Yes. JavaScript added before </head> is parsed and executed before the page content is fully loaded, which may block rendering. Placing JavaScript before </body> ensures the DOM is fully loaded before the script runs, leading to better performance.

[7] Which string function can be used to extract a part of a string and return the extracted part in a new string?
Answer: The slice() method can be used to extract part of a string and return it as a new string.

[8] Which two functions can be used as alternatives to slice() in JavaScript to get the same result?
Answer: The two alternatives to slice() are substring() and substr() (though substr() is considered deprecated).

[9] Which function is common between string objects and array objects in JavaScript?
Answer: The slice() function is common between both string and array objects.

[10] What should I do if I want to count the position from the end in the reverse direction in the slice function (e.g., to extract the last 5 characters of a string)?
Answer: Use negative indices in the slice() method. For example, to extract the last 5 characters: str.slice(-5).

[11] What does the splice() method do? What is the recently introduced alternative method of it?
Answer: The splice() method adds, removes, or replaces elements in an array, modifying the original array. The recently introduced alternative is the toSpliced() method, which returns a new array with the modifications, leaving the original array unchanged.

[12] Which is the one method common for all JavaScript objects?
Answer: The toString() method is common for all JavaScript objects.

[13] What will [1, 2, 3].map(alert) this line do?
Answer: It will alert each element of the array individually (i.e., 1, 2, and 3), as map() executes the callback function (in this case, alert) on every element of the array.

[14] Which method can I use to convert a multi-dimensional array into a one-dimensional array?
Answer: You can use the flat() method to convert a multi-dimensional array into a one-dimensional array.

[15] How are the delete(), pop(), and shift() methods in an array different?
Answer:

• delete() removes the element but does not change the array length or reindex the array.
• pop() removes the last element of the array and reduces the length by one.
• shift() removes the first element of the array and reindexes the remaining elements.

These questions span a wide range of JavaScript knowledge, from basic syntax to practical usage of array and string methods. Preparing for them will boost candidates' confidence during interviews for positions like “Website Designer” and “Frontend Developer” at Proficed.

1. Is it possible to make the <b> tag work like the <i> tag and vice-versa using CSS? If yes, how? If no, why not?

• Yes, it is possible to make the <b> tag behave like the <i> tag and vice-versa by using the font-style and font-weight properties in CSS.
  • To make <b> behave like <i>, apply font-style: italic;.
  • To make <i> behave like <b>, apply font-weight: bold;.
  • To revert <b> back to normal text (non-bold), apply font-weight: normal;.
  • To revert <i> back to normal text (non-italic), apply font-style: normal;.

2. What is the difference between the <strong> and <b> tags?

• <strong> has semantic meaning, indicating that the content is of strong importance. It is often displayed as bold text, but its meaning can also be interpreted by screen readers.
• <b> is purely a visual element used to make text bold without any semantic meaning.

3. Are there any math functions in CSS?

• Yes, CSS includes several math functions like calc(), min(), max(), and clamp() to perform calculations directly within the CSS.

4. How can I number headings using CSS?

You can use the counter-reset and counter-increment properties in CSS along with the content property in a ::before pseudo-element to number headings.

h1 {
    counter-reset: section;
}
h1::before {
    counter-increment: section;
    content: "Section " counter(section) ". ";
}

5. What is the difference between em and rem in CSS?

• em is relative to the font size of its nearest parent element, while rem is relative to the font size of the root element (html tag). This makes rem easier to predict across different components.

6. How can you change the color of the blinking cursor on a textbox using CSS?

You can change the color of the blinking cursor (caret) using the caret-color property in CSS.

input {
    caret-color: red;
}

7. I want to create a responsive div that is 20% wider than its parent, but its width should range between 50px and 500px. Which CSS property can be used if I don't want to use min-width and max-width?

The clamp() CSS function can be used here. It allows setting a preferred value with limits, which in this case is 20% width with a minimum of 50px and a maximum of 500px.

div {
    width: clamp(50px, 20%, 500px);
}

8. What are the CSS Units?

• CSS units are measurements used in web design. They include:
  • Absolute units: px, cm, mm, in
  • Relative units: em, rem, vw, vh, %

9. What are CSS transitions?

CSS transitions allow you to change property values smoothly (over a given duration) instead of instantaneously.

div {
    transition: background-color 0.5s ease;
}

10. What is masking in CSS?

• Masking in CSS is used to hide part of an element using an image or gradient, creating visual effects. You can use the mask property to apply a mask over an element.

11. How can you make a div transparent without using the opacity property?

You can achieve transparency by using an rgba color with an alpha value for the background color.

div {
    background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5); /* 50% transparent */
}

12. Which pseudo-element should be used for drop-capping a paragraph?

The ::first-letter pseudo-element can be used to create a drop-capped effect on the first letter of a paragraph.

p::first-letter {
    font-size: 2em;
    float: left;
}

13. How can you indent the first line of text in a paragraph?

Use the text-indent property to indent the first line of a paragraph.

p {
    text-indent: 20px;
}

14. Using which CSS property can you apply graphical effects such as blur or grayscale to images?

The filter property can be used to apply graphical effects like blur or grayscale.

img {
    filter: blur(5px) grayscale(100%);
}

15. There is an image that is 400px wide and 300px tall. I want to fit it inside a div that is 200px wide and 300px tall. I want to make sure no part of the image is cropped and no part of the image is stretched. What should I do?

You should use the object-fit: contain; property to ensure that the image scales to fit the div without being stretched or cropped.

img {
    width: 100%;
    height: 100%;
    object-fit: contain;
}

These questions span a wide range of CSS knowledge, from foundational properties to advanced concepts like Flexbox and Grid layouts. Preparing for them will boost candidates' confidence during interviews for positions like “Website Designer” and “Frontend Developer” at Proficed.

1. Recruiters Are Watching: Your LinkedIn Activity Matters

• Recruiters frequently browse through LinkedIn profiles to gauge the professionalism and compatibility of potential candidates. Everything from your posts to your likes and comments is visible to your network, including recruiters.
• Engaging with political content—even passively—can influence how others perceive your profile. A single interaction with a political figure’s post may lead to assumptions about your political stance, which can be a red flag for some employers.

2. Don't let the politicians succeed

• People often get caught up in heated debates over political issues on social media, but these discussions rarely lead to any real change.
• Political parties’ IT cells work with a single purpose: to hijack your time, attention, and mind, filling them with their own agenda. Their goal is to provoke arguments and polarize public opinion, diverting you from more important personal and professional priorities.
• Don’t let them succeed—remember, their objective is to benefit themselves, not you. Engaging in these debates only drains your time and energy, which could be better invested in your career growth.
• Politicians on LinkedIn are not there to promote any good; they are there to divide you and rule, as they have been doing for ages.

3. The Dangers of Political Division on Your Professional Image

• In today’s highly polarized environment, political opinions are a source of division and conflict. People tend to be less tolerant of viewpoints that differ from their own, and this intolerance can spill over into professional settings.
• If a potential employer or recruiter perceives you as affiliated with a political ideology they oppose, it could influence their opinion of you, regardless of your professional qualifications.
• The risk of alienating someone based on perceived political views, whether accurate or not, is very real.

4. Unintentional Clicks, Real Consequences: How One Like Can Harm You

• It only takes one accidental like or comment on a politician’s post to have that activity displayed on your network’s feed. This seemingly harmless interaction can lead to misinterpretations about your political affiliations.
• For example, if you unintentionally engage with a post by a controversial political figure, your network—including potential employers—might assume you endorse their views.
• This assumption can negatively impact your professional image, making you appear biased or politically active in a way that some recruiters might find unappealing.

5. Guard Your Professional Opportunities

• Imagine you’re a strong candidate for a role, but the hiring manager happens to notice your engagement with a politically charged post. Even if your interaction was accidental or based on curiosity, they may form an opinion that you’re an active supporter of a particular ideology.
• If they disagree with that ideology, this could create a bias against you before you even get a chance to showcase your skills and experience.
• In this way, you risk alienating potential employers who might otherwise have been interested in your professional qualifications.

6. Negative Impact on Mental Well-being

• Engaging with political content on social media isn’t just risky for your career—it can also be harmful to your mental well-being.
• Political debates on social media often lead to feelings of anger, frustration, and negativity. These emotions can distract you from your professional goals, such as networking, skill development, and job searching.
• Instead of focusing on productive activities, you might find yourself caught up in arguments with strangers, wasting valuable time and energy that could be better spent building your career.

7. Distraction from Professional Goals

• Following political figures on LinkedIn can lead to a constant stream of notifications and politically charged content, distracting you from your primary objectives.
• If you’re serious about advancing your career, it’s essential to maintain focus and prioritize activities that contribute to your professional growth.
• Political debates, no matter how engaging, can easily sidetrack you, making it harder to achieve your career goals.

Conclusion

• In the end, your LinkedIn profile should reflect your professional strengths and aspirations. By avoiding political content and unfollowing political figures, you reduce the risk of being misjudged based on your online activity.
• This helps you stay focused on your career and avoids potential conflicts with recruiters or employers who might not share your political views.
• Concentrate on building a profile that showcases your skills, experience, and professional achievements, and steer clear of political debates that could harm your career prospects.
• Take a moment today to review your LinkedIn activity and make necessary changes. Unfollow any political pages or figures that could distract from your professional image, and focus on building a profile that truly represents your career ambitions. Your next job opportunity could depend on it!

Even in WhatsApp Communications

This issue isn't limited to formal interviews. Sometimes, when a candidate reaches out to an HR representative via WhatsApp without introducing themselves and when HR doesn't even have an idea which job the candidate applied for, they may respond with, "Which vacancy have you applied for?" they respond with, "What job vacancies are available?" This response suggests a lack of confidence, direction and preparation, which can be a major turn-off for interviewers.

Imagine approaching HR through WhatsApp, and they ask you, "Which vacancy have you applied for?" If you respond by asking, "What job vacancies are available?" it sends a clear message: you’re not confident about the role you’re pursuing.

Worse, this question makes the HR think that you're not confident about your skills and abilities. Would you hire someone who doesn’t even know what job they want? It’s like saying, “I’m not sure why I’m here, but I’ll take whatever you’ve got.” Even if such candidates are hired, there’s a fear that they’ll take on the role reluctantly, without real enthusiasm.

From personal experience, when someone asks me this question after applying for a particular job, I’m often tempted to respond sarcastically: “Yes, we have a vacancy for a janitor. Would you like to apply for that?” It’s not that interviewers are being harsh; it’s that such questions make it clear that the applicant isn’t serious or well-prepared.

So, What Should You Do Instead?

If you’re a job seeker, always research the company and understand the role you’re applying for. Be prepared to discuss why you’re interested in that specific position and how your skills align with it. For example, when asked, “Which vacancy have you applied for?” a well-prepared response could be, “I applied for the Marketing Executive position because I believe my experience in digital marketing aligns well with the role’s requirements.” Whether it's a formal interview setting or an initial conversation on WhatsApp, show that you’re committed, focused, and eager to contribute to the company’s success.

Don’t let one misguided question cost you your dream job. Always know the role you're applying for, and demonstrate why you're the perfect fit. By showing clarity and confidence, you’ll leave a lasting impression that sets you apart.

Remember: Companies are not offering a buffet of jobs where job seekers can pick whichever they like. Recognize the scarcity of jobs and the high supply of labor. Once you apply for a job, don’t ask the recruiter if other options are available.